
The record industry is about twenty-five years into a massive devaluation of its products. This devaluation is not due to some invisible calculus the way, say, corn loses value. Itâs simpler and far more frightening than that. The devaluation of recorded music has happened in the hearts and minds of the end consumer.
Why donât listeners value recorded music any more?
For years that question has had the entire record industry scrambling for explanations. We blame everything from Napster to streaming services to crappy music to the apparent lack of inventive subcultures to the disappearance of free time from our lives to the economy. There are so many explanations; most of them are somewhat valid; all of them are incomplete. While it seems logical to try to figure out what happened, I think the more important thing is to focus squarely on the future and simply ask:
How do we get listeners to value records again?
My answer is nearly as simple as the question: We need to make the experience of listening to records move people so deeply that
We talk so much about the value of the records, the copyrights, the masters, the physical objects, the streams, the files, but we forget that what a listener is going to value is the experience of listening. Just as a surfer values the surfing, a reader values reading, and a gardner values gardening, itâs not the surfboard, the book or the flower that matters most to the end user; itâs their experience engaging with these objects. Itâs a subtle distinction between object and experience of an object, but itâs an important one. And if that experience is powerful enough, people will value it.
What makes for moving listening experience is an endlessly complex question. Mood, memories, associations, culture, specific context - all of these impact a listening experience, and we canât really control any of that. However, with all that acknowledged, a recording has a far greater chance of moving a listener emotionally if the sound quality during that experience is great and truly delivers what the artist wanted the listener to hear. And if the experience is moving, listeners will find the inherent value there and be willing to pay for that experience. Without great sound quality, I donât think weâve got a chance of bringing the value back to this industry. If listening to records is not a powerful and moving experience, who would pay for it?
You might have access to every single recording ever made, but if listening to them doesnât blow your mind, where theâs value in those recordings?
Hereâs an important conundrum. A lot of people who think they have heard great sound actually havenât. Iâm not talking about the 10-year-old whose parents finally bought her an iPod with blown-out Disney soundtracks on it. Iâm talking about music aficionados well into their 30s who missed the hi-fidelity of the 70s and 80s and who slowly slid down the steady decline in listening quality over the past twenty years from CDs on boom boxes to MP3 players to cell-phones and (dammit Steve Jobs!) earbuds. Perhaps theyâve spent a couple hundred dollars on decent headphones by now, but theyâre still rocking compressed files on cell-phones whose DAC and headphone amp are incapable of delivering a great listening experience. Or, perhaps theyâre streaming 128kps Ogg files over Spotify to a bluetooth speaker, yet another delivery system utterly incapable of stopping anyone in their tracks with great sonics. Mediocre sound quality is the norm, and even relatively affluent, avid music fans think thatâs just how records sound - mediocre.
But, thereâs good news. With the advent of portable head-fi, itâs now exceptionally easy for people to hear incredibly great sound.
I recently got an
hi-res digital player and a pair of headphones (which Larry Crane reviewed ). On the Astell&Kern player was a collection of albums at 192k, 96k, 88.2k and the stunning DSD format - everything from Pink Floyd to Bach to Beck to Michael Jackson and a whole lot more music transferred beautifully to these hi-res formats from original masters. The individual provenance of each recording is hard to find (a topic worthy of its own discussion), but these files are nothing like what Iâve heard before from albums Iâve known my whole life. And the Astell&Kern player is a very sophisticated machine that incorporates great converters, great analog stages, adequate power and a great headphone amp (you can ).And so Iâve started asking people to listen to this little rig. Iâve taken it to bars, out in the woods, to a BBQ, on a drive, down to a riverside park, over to a friendâs house and straight to bed where my partner has been doing some deep listening. People are blown away. They close their eyes, their mouths open up that little bit, their body language changes, and to my delight more than a couple of them have been brought to tears. Iâve rarely seen listeners brought to tears other than at live shows and in the studio when a record is sounding really amazing on the monitors. Now I can carry that experience around in my pocket.
Some people will be quick to point out that the system Iâm carrying around with me has a retail value of over $1600. And when you add the music on top, itâs more like $3000 or $4000, probably more. The common assumption these days is that âaverage peopleâ wont pay that much for music, and so this whole hi-res head-fi thing is clearly not the solution weâre after.
Listeners paying a lot of money for recorded music is
Thatâs exactly what the streaming services would have you believe. âMusic needs to be like water,â says Spotifyâs leader Daniel Ek. Or, like corn? Look, I love a tall refreshing glass of water, but donât tell me that this planetâs most abundant substance is in some way similar to the human artistic and technological achievement known as a great sounding record that can bring listeners to tears. Valuing recordings the same way we value something that falls out of the sky on a regular basis is not going to help this industry. We need to stop being so shocked by the notion that hearing a great record sound great might cost someone a decent amount of cash.
I am well aware that streaming is likely to become the dominant distribution model (until it is supplanted by the next thing). I also assume that - barring some infrastructure collapse - the internet will get faster and the sound of streaming is going to get better and eventually be capable of delivering the quality of todayâs file-based portable head-fi systems. Eventually.
But what are we to do in the mean time? Let another generation of people never experience truly moving listening experiences? Let another generation believe that records should hold a value hovering somewhere near $0.00?
If we let that happen the record industry is going to continue to devolve into unsustainable chaos. We need to find a way to deliver listening experiences that will bring people to tears and - as unpopular as this point of view is - we need to be charging good money for it.
Right now weâre delegating the responsibility of moving people and charging them for it to live performance. Itâs no coincidence that weâre expecting people to pay exorbitant prices for concert tickets and expecting artists to rely on live-show revenues for their income, because the live show experience has just gotten better and better as listening to records has gotten worse and worse. Weâve simply shifted the value of deeply moving experiences from records to concerts. But now amazing listening experiences delivered on portable head-fi systems can bring that level of emotional engagement and intimacy to listeners for not that much more than the cost of a few high-end concerts tickets.
And itâs already starting to happen. People are spending
And once you hear truly great head-fi, youâll probably realize why Iâm so excited about it, both as someone who cares about the health of the recording industry, as someone who makes records and as a listener.
As we sail forward at the lightening pace of modern technologyâs progress, we can expect to see head-fi equipment start to come down in price. PONO is already offering their 192k-capable player for $400, and weâre already seeing the quality of headphones starting to go up at reasonable price points - all of this while people grow more aware that there might be better listening experiences to discover. And now brick-and-mortar headphone shops are cropping up all over the country, helping show people directly what different head-fi systems can do, what theyâll get for their money, and why itâs worth it.
Who could have imagined brick-and-mortar headphone shops even three years ago?
Iâve heard the critique of the headphone industry: much of headphones sales have been kind of crappy overpriced cans that arenât exactly blowing anyoneâs minds sonically. Theyâre fashion statements with wires. But thereâs two very important things happening here: 1) people are paying a
Thatâs where we professional record makers come in. Of all people in this industry, we should be doing all we can to make sure that the records weâre making are getting onto portable head-fi systems with the best sound possible. We can become advocates for portable head-fi. And we need to become sensitive to future-proofing our masters for these formats: we need to start working at higher sampling rates and with converters that sound good at higher sampling rates; we need to be getting between headphones more and more as we work to make sure weâre delivering for the actual playback systems most people will be listening on in the future.
Iâve even started to question the validity of my mixing on traditional monitors. Is it possible that weâre exiting the era in which we can expect people to sit in the sweet spot between two speakers? Have we already left that paradigm behind? Wouldnât it make more sense to prepare our masters specifically for headphones and earbuds? Do our mixes made for speakers really play all that well on headphones? Iâm grappling with these questions all the time.
Iâm surprised more record makers arenât more excited by the possibility of listeners hearing what we hear in the studio. Iâve transferred a few analog masters to 192k and to DSD and itâs stunning to hear a near replica on a great portable system. I actually canât think of anything more gratifying as a mixer than knowing that the sound we achieved in the studio is now traveling the world more or less in tact with a good chance of moving listeners as much as it moved us as we made it.
The record industry canât afford to let another generation miss out on deeply moving listening experiences. If we do, weâre only going to be sustaining the culture in which records are massively devalued
The Aesthetic Revolution Will Be Beautiful Allen F.
Allen Farmelo is a producer/engineer (
) and founder of Butterscotch Records ( ).MORE ENTRIES

November 24, 2014
The Inaugural Advanced Audio + Application Exchange (A3E) in Boston: A Gear Geek Love Letter
BY Andy Hong
This past September, I attended the inauguralA3Exchangein Boston and hadone of the most enjoyable conference experiences in years.A small team of forw...

November 21, 2014
End Rant #104: Food for Thought
BY Larry Crane
I've pulled together a collection of recent thoughts I've had about the recording process. You can agree or not agree. The important thing is to use y...

September 29, 2014
Legendary Malibu Studio Indigo Ranch Is Auctioning Off Its Remaining Collection of Gear
BY Dave Middleton
Richard Kaplan, owner engineer of famed recording studio Indigo Ranch[Tape Op#103] is selling the remainder of his classic equipment collection. It in...

September 29, 2014
U2's Songs of Innocence "Review"
BY John Baccigaluppi
I'm not actually going to review the music on this record;it's free, just go get it and listen to it yourself. Instead, I'm a bit fascinated by the me...

September 29, 2014
Free Exhibits Plus Badge to AES Los Angeles 2014 for Tape Op Readers
BY Dave Middleton
Just a quick note about the upcomingAudio Engineering Society (AES) conventionin Los Angeles. We have arranged for allTape Opreaders to receive afree ...

July 22, 2014
"Give Me A Hammer": Why the Audio Industry Needs Simple, Stable Tools More Now Than Ever
BY John Baccigaluppi
It was at a recent trade show, after a major DAW manufacturer cancelled our meeting,that I realized I was relieved to be off the hook. I always enjoy ...

April 6, 2014
Could 192k Simply Make Good Common Sense?
BY Allen Farmelo
As we exit the era of digital audio data compression and begin the ascent into higher sample rates for consumer consumption (via multiple platforms, t...

March 24, 2014
The Possibility of Subconscious Auditory Effects in Audioworkers - A Case for Renewing Humility and Wonder in the Field of Professional Audio
BY Allen Farmelo
Subconscious Auditory Effects (SAE) is a term I have cobbled together to encapsulate a broad range of phenomena in this barely-studied field of inquir...