I got an email the other day from a PR person looking for Tape Op to write an article about several "known" engineer/producers and their drum recording techniques in the studio. These guys are known, and one of them we've written about and I think he's a pretty great engineer, but the other two have really worked on some mainstream crap. Here's my response, with names removed of course. This is what I deal with every day, and I hope it gives folks an idea of the BS I have to deal with and how John and I keep the magazine on track. Other mags, well - they can do whatever they want. -LC XXXXXXX, I'm not sure if you've readTape Opbefore, but we don't do many articles like this. I prefer to keep with interview format pieces, or some articles about certain subjects or persons. We've interviewed XXXXXX before, and we don't do repeat interviews. I hate to have to say it, but folks like XXXXX and XXXXX have worked on some of my least favorite music of the last few decades. I know they have platinum records and Grammies and all, and maybe they're just doing their jobs, but in my eyes they've also helped mid-wife a lot of junk into the marketplace. InTape Opwe're looking for folks working on timeless, lasting, interesting and unique recordings. Sorry to be blunt about it, but it's just the way we decided to approach this 12 years ago, and our status as the second largest magazine in this field, and one not owned by an outside publishing company, leads me to believe I've made the right choice. I also find it odd to have an article about drum recording from people who replace and/or reinforce most of their drums with samples in the mix. As an engineer/producer myself I love the possibilities these techniques open up, but the bland, homogenized sound we hear on the radio these days is part of what is killing the music biz in my mind. I wish none of your clients any ill will, and I hope they enjoy their work, but it just isn't of any interest to me. I hope this isn't too negative, or you walk away thinking I'm some sort of asshole, but as you can tell is see this magazine as more than a place to get some press for engineers and producers and as a forum for the art of recording. All the best, Larry Crane, Tape Op Magazine
MORE ENTRIES

December 19, 2008
AutoTune as the Subject of a Song?
BY Larry Crane
Yup. And here's thevideo. Funny as shit. "Thanks AutoTune!"

December 11, 2008
Tape Op Microphone Reviews online!
BY Larry Crane
Matt McGlynn over at the informativeRecording Hackssite has a section devoted to Tape Opmic reviews. Not all of them are up yet, and we're not quite s...

November 18, 2008
Henry Hirsch and his new Waterfront Studios
BY Larry Crane
Remember Henry Hirsch from issue ? He's moved locations yet again, and his new studio (in Hudson, NY) looks fabulous. Check it outhere. An unreal spac...

October 22, 2008
Behringer City?
BY Larry Crane
Our compatriots over at Australia's fineAudio Technologymagazine posted this video of a visit to Behringer City.See Video Here.It's a curious visit an...

October 22, 2008
Jackpot! Will have a new Neve soon!
BY Larry Crane
By November 24th we will have installed a new Rupert Neve Designs 5088 console at my studio, Jackpot! Recording Studio, in Portland, OR. Excited? Of c...

October 17, 2008
Eno, Generative Music and Bloom for iPhone
BY Larry Crane
I just bought the crazy app for my iPhone by Brian Eno andPeter Chilverscalled Bloom. It creates, or allows you to create, ambient type music on your ...

October 17, 2008
Larry Crane at Wordstock, Portland, OR, Nov. 8
BY Larry Crane
That’s right, somehow a lowly engineer and magazine editor that can’t even type has been asked to read some excerpts from Tape Op: The Book About Crea...

October 16, 2008
John Baccigaluppi's 2008 AES Surf Report
BY Larry Crane
I'm posting this for John as he's finishing up the next issue of Tape Op. -LC

October 15, 2008
Record of the Week Club
BY Larry Crane
ReaderMike Petkaudropped a line about the cool site and collaboration he started: "I wanted to point you to a project I've currently wrapped up. For 1...