If youāve listened to metal records produced in the last two decades, youāve surely heard the work of Andy Sneap. Killswitch Engage, Megadeth, Carcass, and Judas Priest are only a few of the artists whose works have been given his treatment: tight, snarling mixes where the bandsā virtuosity and chops can be heard with full force and clarity. In 2018 and 2019, Andy toured with Judas Priest as one half of their twin guitar attack, subbing in for an ailing Glenn Tipton. With touring ground to a halt throughout the pandemic, Andyās studio work has resumed with albums from Saxon and John Petrucci (Dream Theater) among his upcoming batch of works. We caught up over Zoom at his home in Derbyshire, UK, to chat about his evolution as an engineer from his early days in Oakland, California, to rehearsal spaces, to producing Judas Priestās warmly received Firepower.
If youāve listened to metal records produced in the last two decades, youāve surely heard the work of Andy Sneap. Killswitch Engage, Megadeth, Carcass, and Judas Priest are only a few of the artists whose works have been given his treatment: tight, snarling mixes where the bandsā virtuosity and chops can be heard with full force and clarity. In 2018 and 2019, Andy toured with Judas Priest as one half of their twin guitar attack, subbing in for an ailing Glenn Tipton. With touring ground to a halt throughout the pandemic, Andyās studio work has resumed with albums from Saxon and John Petrucci (Dream Theater) among his upcoming batch of works. We caught up over Zoom at his home in Derbyshire, UK, to chat about his evolution as an engineer from his early days in Oakland, California, to rehearsal spaces, to producing Judas Priestās warmly received Firepower.
The first thing I want to trace back to is 1997 and Another Lesson in Violence by Exodus. That was recorded live at the Trocadero [in San Francisco], correct?
I didnāt actually record the live bits. The first album I did in America was The More Things Change⦠by Machine Head. I was the mix engineer on that. I tracked the guitars with Robb [Flynn] in San Francisco and then mixed it in L.A. After that I did Skinlab for Century Media, and then I did Exodus. They had the same management, Debbie Abono. I got linked in with Exodus then and never looked back.
Thereās a whole Bay Area connection there with Skinlab, Machine Head, and Exodus.
Testament, also. Iāve done a lot of work in the Bay Area. It was done at Hyde Street, which used to be Alpha & Omega [Recording]. I did loads of work there. A lot in rehearsal rooms. Whatās that main one?
Soundwave Studios.
Weāve done loads of recording at Soundwave. Testamentās got a room in there. We also had Craig [Locicero]ās old room upstairs, which we called Flabby Road Studios.
On some of those early albums, like The More Things Changeā¦, that was the mid- to late-ā90s, when Pro Tools was starting.
We were still on multitrack tape, running two 24-track Studer machines on that. I remember I was running Cubase on a PC for triggers, moving kick drums around. It wasnāt until Nevermore [on Dead Heart in a Dead World], which was one of the first albums where I used Pro Tools for pretty much all the tracking. I was still using a lot of outboard gear on that. Pro Tools slowly crept in toward the end of the ā90s. In fact, the first album I used Pro Tools on was the first Blaze Bayley [Wolfsbane] album [Silicon Messiah]. I bought my first blue and white [Apple Macintosh] G3 with Pro Tools 4.3 on it. I had one [Digidesign] 888 [I/O] and an ADAT bridge. I was using my ADATs as interfaces, transferring onto ADAT with the BRC, and linking it all up like that. That would have been ā98.
You were talking about using triggers in Cubase. Were you using hardware triggers?
I was just triggering into Cubase using an [Alesis] D4 [drum module] to create MIDI. We used an Atari ST [computer] before that. I think it was [Emagic] Notator [Logic] to do a MIDI note, using SMPTE off the tape, and MTC [MIDI time code] to sync it up. It worked pretty well. I used the D4 and an Akai S1000 [sampler] for sounds. When we couldnāt do the MIDI side of it, weād go off the sync head, delay it, and put it back in time. There are ways around it, but it was very basic back then.
The collection of kick and snare samples that you had must have been a lot more limited, right?
Oh, it was totally single-shot. Thatās why those albums do sound a bit machine-like at times. There was no real variance in the sounds. Thatās come a long way since back then, but it worked. We blended it, and it gave us that consistency in the sound we were after to help get clarity on the mix.
With a lot of those thrash bands ā and Iām sure [Andyās first band] Sabbat ādidnāt get the clarity of the kick drum back in the ā80s. Plus, there were no high-gain guitar amps yet.
In the ā80s I was using [Marshall] JCM800 [guitar amps]. On our second album [Dreamweaver] I was using the [Marshall] Silver Jubilee with a Boss GE-7 [graphic equalizer stompbox] and a noise gate to tighten the front end. But on the third Sabbat album [Mourning Has Broken], we did trigger the kick drums on that. We triggered it live off the recording; there was probably one or two mis-hits on that. That was the early ā90s. Some of the other albums that were around, people were using the old TC [Electronic delay] units to trigger. You could store samples in that and fire off it.
When I listen to that first Testament album [The Legacy], I hear this little tap on the kick drum; but when Louie [Clemente] gets into the big triplet [double bass drum] parts, it loses it all.
I know, right? You listen to those Slayer albums. The faster kick sound is there. You can tell itās there, but itās a blur, isnāt it? Itās that rumble. Itās kind of nice, in a way. Itās a bit more natural. But if you keep it like that ā more natural ā for a drummer now, they expect to hear the kick drums more.
Albums like Violent Revolution by Kreator or The Gathering by Testament were coming to you. Iām putting myself in Mille [Petrozza] or Eric Petersonās head and thinking, āThis is the way we wish it wouldāve sounded when we were 19.ā
I know! Itās funny. Iāll listen back to The Gathering or some of the work I was doing in the late ā90s. People say, āOh, itās a benchmark album.ā Blah, blah, blah. But I donāt think it actually sounds that good now. It does sound a little dated to me. Itās not got the clarity and natural feel. Mind you, saying that, we did that in the rehearsal room on ADAT, bouncing it back through the Soundcraft Ghost [console] onto two tracks of the ADAT. It was pretty primitive. We did okay, for the time. Obviously, if we were doing that album now, itād be a bit more refined.
People complain about music being more digitized and less natural sounding as years go on. Youāre talking about your productions becoming more natural sounding.
I went to a point where I realized how much you could edit something. [In the] early 2000s, a lot of people ā including myself ā fell into this thing of getting parts so tight, so precise, and so mechanical. Weād be going in and editing everything, so it was sucking the life out of it. It was perfect, the performance, and weād be looping parts. It got to the point where I was like, āThis is so boring to listen to!ā We want to hear a bit of that rawness there, and a bit of movement. A more mature approach is to try and get the best performance, refine it a little bit, and get it tight. But youāve also got to know when to stop with that and know when you are actually killing it. When I listen now to what Iām doing, I think itās tight and itās in tune. Itās got a good vibe. Thatās part of the thing about being a good producer. Iām keeping the energy in there, keeping that vibe, the tightness, not killing it, and Iām getting the clarity out of it as well.
How does that translate to your guitar micāing? I know youāve been a [Shure SM]57 guy for a long time.
I still always use a 57. I try a few other mics now, even some room mics. I was always thinking, āItās gotta be close micād and really direct, in your face.ā Iāve come away from that a little bit, and now I try to get it a little more vibey. Nothing drastic; I try to get a fullness with a different sound left and right to widen the mix. Thatās something I was never doing back in the early 2000s; trying to mix it up a bit and make it more fun, rather than the same thing every time.

How do you keep it fun for yourself when youāre working on thrash and death metal albums regularly?
I donāt really work on that stuff all the time [now]. When you look at what I have been working on, itās been a lot more classic metal; something with a bit more melody to it. Iām a bit more selective now. Iād rather have a couple weeks off than sessions back to back all the time. It wears you out. This job really does; it beats you down after a while. And a project will always take longer. If Iāve got the extra time there, Iāll use it. Iāll eat into it.
Are bands coming to you more for your role as a producer rather than as an engineer? Are they looking more for your musical input rather than just a knob-twiddler?
It still varies. Something like Judas Priest; Iām there in a production role. Thinking about recently, for John Petrucci [Terminal Velocity] I was just the mixer. Itās still across the board, really. The fact people know me as a producer and a guitar player, especially as a guitar player now, they realize Iāve got something to put in on the production front. But with the COVID thing, thereāve been a lot more mixes happening. People have tended to record their own tracks and have been getting in touch to get them mixed.
Is re-amping playing a big role in that?
I try not to re-amp. If an artist has got a sound that they particularly want to use, and theyāve tracked with it, then Iāll go with it. Iāll try to work with it as far as I can. If somethingās really not working, or I think it could benefit them, then Iāll talk to them and see what we can sort out. But Iām not one of these guys who is dead set on re-amping everything he gets. Again, going back to John Petrucci, heās very particular. Heās got his MESA/Boogie [guitar amp] that he wanted to use. It was a little dark for me on his solo album, but I thought, āRight, Iāll get what I can out of it with EQ.ā It pushes me. I usually find that we can reach that balance where theyāre getting what they want, and we can make it work. We had three EQs in the chain trying to dig some more top end out of it; but it worked well, and it ended up as something different than if I would have re-amped it. It was cool, in a way. I always learn off every project that I do.
In mixes Iāve done, the high end of the bass [guitar] seems to be in a constant fight between the click of the kick drum and the presence of the guitar.
I never had that problem. If Iām using a bass amp, Iād be using a [Shure] Beta 52, which has less of a high end click to it. Itās got more of that rock knock to it when you use it for a kick drum. Iām looking around 800 Hz to 1 kHz for that small, nasal frequency. A hair of it can help you on small speakers. Sometimes Iāll throw the [bass] DI back to a SansAmp and filter it, so itās just a narrow band and blend it in. You can be 10 dB down on this in the mix. It gives the bass that extra little space. I find that DI and the mic blended, as long as itās in phase, itāll set the bass where it needs to be and not get in the way of the guitar. Iām looking at the mids; that 1 kHz area. I call it a āpig hunting for truffles.ā Youāll get that āsnortingā to the bass sound. I remember Shane [Embury] from Napalm [Death] used to run into a SansAmp. It sounded like a digger; like some mechanical device grinding away in the background.
I always think back to [Metallicaās] Master of Puppets; the gold standard for the original heavy metal bass tone.
Itās got scooped guitars, and the bass fits in that hole. You can almost see it when you think about it, where everythingās sitting.
Weāre using our ears, but at the same time the mix almost becomes visible. Itās like a puzzle.
Youāre slotting everything together. When Iāve been on a mix for two weeks, Iāll get a bit lost and canāt see the wood for the trees. Iāve been mixing Exodus. Gary [Holt] contacted me the other day and said, āAre the guitars too quiet?ā I listened to it again with fresh ears and they werenāt too quiet, but they were lacking something in the mids. There was a bit of a hole under the vocals. So, we recalled it, recalling the desk and the outboard gear. Straightaway I could hear what it needed to be, and what should be dialed in. At the time, we were focusing on all this other stuff and couldnāt hear it. Sometimes walking away and coming back, putting another project between myself and the mix I was doing, is so valuable. Iāve got instinct when I first hear it, āAh! I hear whatās missing now.ā I always try and do that. I try to walk in in the morning and listen to it, and then, within the first 30 seconds to a minute, make a call on where levels need to be. Then usually Iām in the right place.
Are there certain times of the day when your ears are going to be working better for this pretty up-tempo and energetic music?
First thing in the morning. I get to a point, usually around eight oāclock in the evening. I work quite late sometimes, but if Iām doing donkey work ā like triggers, editing, and cleaning tracks up ā thatās fine. Iāll try and do that late in the day. But I always avoid anything like EQāing hi-hats or overheads late in the day. I donāt think itās our hearing, but Iām in a different place mentally. Weāre tired. When youāre tired, your perspective changes. I need that fresh approach and that gut instinct to get the right thing going. The attitude.
When it comes to decision making, the thing that always kills me are drum overheads.
Thatās it! Thatās what Iām saying. I say the two hardest elements to get right are cymbals and bass. Thereās so much variation in both, and itās down to the player, as well. Especially with metal and thrash drummers, they can be so hard on the hi-hat and just tickling that cymbal when theyāre coming off it. And itās the way cymbals and bass are recorded, as well. The low end varies with kick drums. Or the way the bass player plays; whether itās with fingers or a pick. Iām trying to get that constant low end to it, where it doesnāt get in the way, but also so that it doesnāt get too boomy. I can guarantee on a mix the two things that I come back to at the end of the mix ā after weāve tweaked everything and ridden everything ā itās always the cymbals and bass that are the last two parts to get altered.
Whenever Iāve done the spaced-pair configuration for overheads, thereās this back and forth⦠It ends up being a decision of how much of the full kit do I want, or do I want the clarity of a stereo spread?
It depends on what youāre doing. Iāll do a stereo pair above the kit now thatās almost like room mics, in a way. I tend to use the room mics to get a bit more of the body out of the cymbals and the overall kit. Iāll be using the spot mics to try and pull the clarity out a bit more. With China crashes, Iāll go in and edit between the China hits so I can get it to pop out in the mix. It literally might be gone in a matter of seconds, so I might end up pasting a China in to give a bit more sustain. But, yeah; I can spend forever on cymbals. I hate them.
And love them. When they work, they sound so awesome and feel good when you have a good drum mix going.
To be honest, you hear a lot of albums with low cymbals because itās easy to mix that way. When the cymbals arenāt getting in the way, everythingās so clear. But if you can get that excitement on the overheads, it adds a top end excitement to your whole mix. I just did the Accept album [Too Mean to Die] and I was saying to Wolf [Hoffmann], āThe cymbals are too loud!ā It got to that point. Heās like, āNope, itās the drive of the kit.ā You stand in the room with the drummer playing a kit, and the cymbals will kill you. You know what itās like in a rehearsal; the cymbals are so loud. Itās very hard to get cymbals too loud, in a way. Iāll try to get [the mix] to a point where I ask, āAre they too loud?ā
If you can contain the top end and get it under control, then why not give [the mix] that āon a trainā excitement?
And if youāre using a lot of samples in your kit, itāll glue it together as well. It gives it a more natural feel. You get a little bit of that attack on the toms and a bit of the snare in there.
Are you gating the toms or the snare? Or is there Strip Silence editing going on in Pro Tools? I canāt bring myself to trust gate plug-ins. Iād rather go in and make the edits myself.
Iāll edit between the toms. Iāll go in and totally clean the tom tracks up, so youāre hearing just the toms. For snare, Iāll do the snare trigger. Iāll use Massey Plugins DRT [drum replacer] to make a āblip,ā so Iāve got a separate track of a āclickā for the snare. Then I can go and make a MIDI track off it, or I can use it with a [Steven] Slate [Drums] Trigger. Iāll also use that into a sidechain of a gate on the snare, so it gives me a clear snare track. Then Iāll use a little bit of [Sound Radix] Drum Leveler on it. Iāve still got the dynamic tone in there, but it brings the level to a manageable point before I hit a compressor.
Is that compressor on your SSL console, or is that outboard gear?
No, Iāll do most of that within Pro Tools. Iāll tell you what I am liking: Iāve got three of the [FMR Audio] RNC, the Really Nice Compressors, and Iāve got a TK S-Blender so I can parallel mix it. Iāll smash the RNC with the snare and blend 50 percent back in with the TK S-Blender, so itās a nice parallel compression. Iām running everything in stereo on the AWS SSL. Iāll have a stem of the snare, with a little bit of a room mic and maybe a stereo sample in there just to brighten it up, as well as a lot of the natural snare. Thatās coming back on one [channel]. Then Iāve got another channel that has all my snare samples on it. Iāve got a snare sample track and a natural snare track that Iām blending and using some parallel compression [on].
I donāt know if this still holds true, but for a while for vocals it was just a [Shure SM]58, right?
No, not really! No, Iāve always either used a [Shure] SM7 or a decent condenser. On sessions like Exodus with Zet [Souza], or Warrel [Dane] and other people whoāve got quite a midrange in their voice, the SM7 is always good. It grabs it a little bit. Iāve got quite a collection. Iāve got [Neumann U] 67s and [Neumann U] 47 types. I havenāt got real ones, but Iāve got good replicas. Iāve got a [Neumann M] 149 that I use. Iāve got an [AKG] C12 replica. Whatever studio Iāve been working at, itās always been a decent condenser that Iāve used.
For Rob Halford [Judas Priest]?
We used an Advanced Audio CM12 on the Firepower album.
I did want to spend a little time talking about Firepower. Judas Priest said that it was recorded live as a band.
Kind of. We still did quite a lot separately. What had happened since Painkiller, believe it or not, the drums had always gone on last. Theyād used the demos as a template. Itās such a backwards way of doing it. I wanted to get a bit of the band feel back again; a bit of the push and pull, old-school vibe back. I wasnāt so bothered about using a click if we didnāt have to, though we did use a click for the most part. We had about 23 or 24 ideas; rough outlines of songs. Scott [Travis, drums] hadnāt jammed them. Richie [Faulkner, guitar] just played to a click at Glenn [Tipton, guitar]ās place and they put these blocks of ideas down. To me, as a band you havenāt even worked the ideas out. The amount of times bands come back six months later and go, āOh, I wish we could record the album again now,ā is because somethingās pushing and pulling. Someoneās had an idea and is playing something different, and itās embedded itself in the song now. The chorus might pick up a couple of BPM. There are all kinds of ideas. You know what itās like with bands: People throw ideas backwards and forwards, but it doesnāt take away from the main song idea. It adds a band vibe to it rather than one guy writing on a laptop. I wanted to make sure that [the album] had that. We had Richie, Scott, and Ian [Hill, bass] all set up in Glennās live room. We were doing a day of preproduction on the ideas before we put anything down. We had it set up to record so we could listen back to it properly. Weād be jamming it. If there was a good take on the drums that was on the grid, weād keep it. Or if there was a good section, weād keep it and mix it in. It was a lot more of a band vibe of them all playing together. I wouldnāt say it was recorded as a live album ā it certainly wasnāt that ā but there was a lot more of a live vibe to it. I wanted for the drums to go down first, which was what was important to me. It shows big time, because it does feel like people are playing to the drums.
Scottās performance on Firepower was also so much more freewheeling.
Well, itās funny, because I did all the demos with them. This was before Scott came in. I went down there and sat with them and saw all these rough ideas. I took the hard drive away and programmed all the drums on the demos. I was putting the fills in. āYeah, weāll have a bit of [former Judas Priest drummer] Les Binks here, a bit of Scott Travis here.ā We were having a bit of fun with it. There were all these different bits I was putting in. Scott heard the demos and was laughing, āYeah, good luck getting that fill past Glenn!ā I would say, āOh, well; donāt you worry.ā And he came up to me a week later and was like, āDude, you did it! We did it!ā Scott was pleased that he was given a bit more freedom, and I think having the drums programmed helped. Not that he followed what I did, but [the programmed drums] gave people more of an overall picture before Scott came in. Scott was able to elaborate and do his thing. He was given a bit more freedom on it, which is great because Scottās such a good drummer. Heās got some great chops; it would be a shame not to use that skill on an album.
You mentioned, āGood luck getting the idea past Glenn.ā You, Tom [Allom, co-producer], and Mike Exeter [engineer] were the production team on Firepower. What role did Glenn play?
Glennās the boss. Heās the guy who oversees everything. I get on with him great. Heās so dry. Heās very astute at writing and keeping whatās important to a song. You can tell heās refined the song. If something doesnāt play a purpose, itās out. Heās said to me that a soloās gotta be an extension of the song. Itās gotta be a song within a song. If you listen to what heās done on what heās written in the past, itās so right. Glennās very much the guy who sees the overall picture. Glenn has to approve it, even if Tom and myself are producing.
In the final months leading up to the albumās release, they had posted something online like, āGlennās working on final little touches.ā
Obviously, we knew about Glennās health issues [Tipton was diagnosed with Parkinsonās Disease in 2008] when we were doing the record. We had two rooms going. Glenn knows Mike really well. Theyād worked together before on Redeemer of Souls, and Mike had built Glennās studio. Mike and Glenn were working in a B-room sort of setup on Glennās tracks. Me and Tom were with Scott, Richie, and Ian in the main room doing the bulk of the recording, and obviously recording Rob [Halford, vocals]. That gave Glenn the chance to work to the drum tracks and focus on his playing. Obviously, it was taking more time than it would have in the past to go in and tweak it. Weād take Glennās tracks and slot them in, āAll right, we need to sort this part out. This bit feels a bit strange. Letās try to tweak that.ā We were bouncing between each other. Once weād got the basics down, and Glenn had got his solo ideas down, I went with a separate Pro Tools rig and worked with Glenn another week or so on solos, piecing them together and getting these ideas together. We developed this way around the issues that Glennās got, and we made it work.
If you listen to the solos that he does in āLightning Strikeā or āRising From Ruins,ā you couldnāt tell thatās someone with Parkinsonās.
No, and bless him; he was struggling. But he had his ideas ā his basic structure to the solos ā worked out. Heād gotten all that on his laptop. I went back down to the studio with him and sat down, āRight. Weāll try a little harmony on this part. Letās try and get this bit a bit cleaner.ā It was a case of piecing it together. But, mentally, heās got a good way of piecing it together. He knows where he wants to go with it. Weāve got a good relationship. Being a guitarist as well, he can explain it to me. I can sit there with a guitar and we can figure out what itās meant to be and what the harmony would be. Iād sit there, be patient, and get it out of him. Itās all you can do.
It almost sounds like a vocal tracking session.
Oh, absolutely.
I saw something from Rob Dukes [vocals, Exodus and Generation Kill] not too long ago, where he was saying you record ten takes of one line and, word by word, find something cool.
Same with Rob Halford, as well. Rob would come in and do what he wants to do on that part. Tom would have quite a few ideas vocally, as well. And then weād try it with a bit more attitude, a bit more spit in it. Maybe a bit more dynamics on the front of the words. A bit more breathy, maybe. Then weād piece it together to get the vibe and play it back to Rob. Heād say, āRight, let me try this.ā There would be a lot of going back and forth to get the right attitude on it. Rob is the king of timing, when you listen. Everyone goes on about his screams, but his dynamics and the timing ā the way he snaps the words ā no one else does it quite like he does. Heās got a personality. Itās partly his accent, as well. That Brummie [Birmingham] accent; itās the way he delivers the words. I wanted to get some of that, that British Steel midrange to his voice, the attitude in there.
The last time I heard Rob Halford roll his ārās might have been on British Steel.
Iāll take full credit for that! I was like, āRoll the ārā! Itās great.ā Itās so Rob Halford, isnāt it?
Youāre in an interesting position where you worked with a band and then toured with them. How does being a performing member with them change your dynamic as a producer for the next round?
Itās strange, isnāt it? Itās difficult sometimes with bands. You can become such good friends with them ā when you spend a lot of time around them ā that that artist/producer relationship disappears. The Priest guys are so cool, anyway. Thereās never going to be an issue with those guys. Sometimes with bands, that gets to a point where your opinion isnāt valued as much. Iām not saying thatās the case here at all. But sometimes it gets to that point where itās like, āOh, itās just Andy.ā You feel youāve got to step back. Itās gotten to a point sometimes when Iāve gone, āGuys, I think itās time for you to start working with someone else, because you need a fresh approach.ā For me as well, [it] can be boring sometimes, if three, four, five albums in with a band, youāre sort of burnt on ideas for them. So, it does get to a point with bands where itās important that things change.